InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,035.69
(
-1.57%
)
US TECH 100
16,918.80
(
-2.26%
)
Dow Jones
37,815.92
(
-1.49%
)
Brent Oil
85.54
(
-0.42%
)
Bitcoin
60,262.77
(
-0.56%
)
Post# of 104408
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

dms1

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 3
Posts 1005
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/20/2012

dms1

Re: Kurt_Banoffee post# 93841

Thursday, 09/24/2020 12:05:42 PM

Thursday, September 24, 2020 12:05:42 PM

Post# of 104408
" I'm not a lawyer, but it seems obvious to me that the case should not be dismissed. K&L's arguments strike me as ludicrous, if not desperate. "

If the court considered K&L's arguments ludicrous, they would not have requested a reply from QTMM. That's the point of this appeals process, if an appeal is ludicrous or has no legal basis no reply is requested. The fact that a reply was requested means at least one judge found merit in K&L's arguments.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up